Evaluation of Prolonged Rt-Pcr Positivity and Viral Load in COVID-19 Patients

Aim: Real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test is used in the diagnosis of COVID-19. It was aimed to evaluate the factors affecting the viral conversion time, to examine the relationship between viral load, and to determine other factors that may be associated with viral load. Material and Methods: Patients were hospitalized between 15.03.2020-01.08.2020, and viral conversion detected were evaluated retrospectively. Patients were divided into two according to viral conversion time (0-14 days vs >14 days). Results: 349 patients were included in the study (284 vs 65 patients). The age and gender characteristics were similar. Prolonged PCR positivity group had more death (p=0.036) and lower cycle-threshold (CT) value (p=0.017). In the examination of CT values of 246 patients, 228 patients with viral conversion and 18 patients without viral conversion due to death, the CT value was found to be lower, therefore the viral load was higher in patients over 60 years of age (p=0.006), in the presence of cardiovascular system disease (p<0.001) and in patients who died (p<0.001). Conclusion: Prolonged PCR positivity may indicate excess viral load and adverse outcomes. An evaluation including the patient's age, CT value, comorbid conditions, and viral conversion time can give an idea about the prognosis.

Evaluation of the implementation of WHO infection prevention and control core components in Turkish health care facilities: results from a WHO infection prevention and control assessment framework (IPCAF)-based survey.

BACKGROUND: The core components (CCs) of infection prevention and control (IPC) from World Health Organization (WHO) are crucial for the safety and quality of health care. Our objective was to examine the level of implementation of WHO infection prevention and control core components (IPC CC) in a developing country. We also aimed to evaluate health care-associated infections (HAIs) and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in intensive care units (ICUs) in association with implemented IPC CCs. METHODS: Members of the Turkish Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology Specialization Association (EKMUD) were invited to the study via e-mail. Volunteer members of any healt care facilities (HCFs) participated in the study. The investigating doctor of each HCF filled out a questionnaire to collect data on IPC implementations, including the Infection Prevention and Control Assessment Framework (IPCAF) and HAIs/AMR in ICUs in 2021. RESULTS: A total of 68 HCFs from seven regions in Türkiye and the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus participated while 85% of these were tertiary care hospitals. Fifty (73.5%) HCFs had advanced IPC level, whereas 16 (23.5%) of the 68 hospitals had intermediate IPC levels. The hospitals' median (IQR) IPCAF score was 668.8 (125.0) points. Workload, staffing and occupancy (CC7; median 70 points) and multimodal strategies (CC5; median 75 points) had the lowest scores. The limited number of nurses were the most important problems. Hospitals with a bed capacity of > 1000 beds had higher rates of HAIs. Certified IPC specialists, frequent feedback, and enough nurses reduced HAIs. The most common HAIs were central line-associated blood stream infections. Most HAIs were caused by gram negative bacteria, which have a high AMR. CONCLUSIONS: Most HCFs had an advanced level of IPC implementation, for which staffing was an important driver. To further improve care quality and ensure everyone has access to safe care, it is a key element to have enough staff, the availability of certified IPC specialists, and frequent feedback. Although there is a significant decrease in HAI rates compared to previous years, HAI rates are still high and AMR is an important problem. Increasing nurses and reducing workload can prevent HAIs and AMR. Nationwide "Antibiotic Stewardship Programme" should be initiated.

Investigation and long-term monitoring of the presence of neutralizing antibody in patients with COVID-19 disease of different clinical severity.

Understanding the immune responses elicited by severe acute respiratory syndrome virus (SARS-CoV-2) infection is critical to public health policy and vaccine development and prevention of reinfections for COVID-19. It is important to know the neutralizing capacity of antibodies and to monitor their persistence. Patients with COVID-19 were divided into four groups (severe-critical, moderate, mild, and asymptomatic) according to their clinical severity. Antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 spike viral surface protein were investigated by ELISA method 3 and 9 months after the onset of the disease. Neutralizing antibody (NAb) response was evaluated by microneutralization test. Patients who received at least two doses of COVID-19 vaccine after illness were enrolled. SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin G (IgG) and NAb titers were shown to be strongly correlated with disease severity. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG and NAb levels were found to be compatible with each other. After 9 months of follow-up, both IgG and NAb levels continued unabated in individuals who had the disease. In individuals who received at least two doses of the vaccine, these levels increased, except for severe-critical patients. High levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG are indicative, as it is difficult to investigate NAb in routine laboratories. At the same time, it can be predicted that this period may be much longer if it continues for at least 9 months and is reinforced with vaccination.